Home > Categories > Movies > Horror > 28 Weeks Later review
Six months after the rage virus was inflicted on the population of Great Britain, the US Army helps to secure a small area of London for the survivors to repopulate and start again. But not everything goes to plan.
Product reviews...
The sequel to the hit 28 Days Later follows two young children as they return to zombie ravaged London. An area has been cordoned off and zombie free. People are slowly returning to the UK in an attempt to restart life as the zombies have starved to death. Naturally, this chance at a new start doesn't last long before zombies are on the rise again.
This one is a little bit more nerve-wrecking than the first as this time you are following two young children, who in essence, are the symbol and hope for a new start at civilisation, certainly in the UK. But, it still wasn't particularly scary, at least not to me, but it still had some nasty gory scenes and plenty of tension as you had fingers and toes crossed for these plucky kids.
This was, in my opinion, a better film than the first, which isn't something you can say about a lot of sequels, and I hope the writers, directors etc manage to agree upon things and make 28 Months Later.
Random listing from 'Movies'...
Troy is offered a job at Ryan & Sharpay's country club and ends up landing jobs for Gabriella, Chad, Taylor, Kelsi, Jason, Martha and Zeke. He is then introduced to Sharpay's parents and realizes that Sharpay can land him many opportunities and even a basketball scholarship. Meanwhile, while Troy starts hanging out with the rich folk, Chad is worried that Troy will forget his friends. Gabriella feels as though she is losing Troy to Sharpay. In the end, Troy will have to learn how to think about his scholarship without losing his friends.
All trademarks, images and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective companies.
KIWIreviews is an independent entity, part of the Knock Out News Group. This is a free public forum presenting user opinions on selected products, and as such the views expressed do not necessarily reflect the opinion of kiwireviews.nz and are protected under New Zealand law by the "Honest Opinion" clause of the Defamation Act of 1992. KIWIreviews accepts no liability for statements made on this site, on the premise that they have been submitted as the true and honest opinions of the individual posters. In most cases, prices and dates stated are approximate and should be considered as only guidelines.
"Why do banks charge a fee on 'insufficient funds' when they know there is not enough?"
unattributed