Welcome to KIWIreviews - product reviews
•  click here to return to the homepage  •
Welcome visitor.Join us or log in

Product reviews on kiwireviews.nz : Thursday 6th August 2020 - 10:47:30

QuickSearch for:    What is QuickSearch?
QuickJump to:    What is QuickJump?
logon name: p/w:  
I want to:

You Are Here...

Home > Categories > Movies > Action > Birds of Prey (and the Fantabulous Emancipation of One Harley Quinn) review

« A Guide to Second Date Sex reviewA Guide to Second Date SexMilitary Wives reviewMilitary Wives »

Score: 7.8/10  [1 review]
3 out of 5
ProdID: 8561 - Birds of Prey (and the Fantabulous Emancipation of One Harley Quinn) -  Directed by Cathy Yan

Birds of Prey (and the Fantabulous Emancipation of One Harley Quinn)
Sample/s Supplied by:
Click to search for all products supplied by Warner Bros Entertainment

Disclosure StatementFULL DISCLOSURE: A number of units of this product have, at some time, been supplied to KIWIreviews by the company for the purposes of unbiased, independent reviews. No fee was accepted by KIWIreviews or the reviewers themselves - these are genuine, unpaid consumer reviews.
in cinemas 6th February 2020

Birds of Prey (and the Fantabulous Emancipation of One Harley Quinn) product reviews

Margot Robbie reprises her iconic Suicide Squad role in this DC Extended Universe actioner. Written and directed by women (Christina Hodson and Cathy Yan respectively), Birds of Prey sees female characters joining forces against a Gotham City crime lord.

After parting ways with The Joker, Harley Quinn (Robbie) teams up with Black Canary (Jurnee Smollett-Bell, TV's Underground), Huntress (Mary Elizabeth Winstead, 10 Cloverfield Lane) and Renee Montoya (Oscar nominee Rosie Perez, Fearless) to rescue a little girl (Ella Jay Basco in her feature debut) from Black Mask (Ewan McGregor).

Check out Warner Bros Entertainment onlineClick here to see all the listings for Warner Bros Entertainment Visit their website They do not have a Twitter account They do not have a Facebook page They do not have a YouTube Channel They do not have a Pinterest board They do not have an Instagram channel

batman   birds of prey   cathy yan   chris messina   christina hodson   dc   derek wilson   ewan mcgregor   greice santo   harley quinn   joker   jurnee smollettbell   margot robbie   mary elizabeth winstead   matthew willig   rosie perez
Other listings you may be interested in:
Rating: 7.4
The Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call - New OrleansThe Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call - New Orleans
Rating: 8.5
The Last ExorcismThe Last Exorcism
Rating: 8.8
Rating: 8.0
The Wiggles : Wiggle HouseThe Wiggles : Wiggle House
Rating: 10.0
Teenage Mutant Ninja TurtlesTeenage Mutant Ninja Turtles
Rating: 3.0
22 Jump Street22 Jump Street
Rating: 8.8
Rating: 6.6
Jurassic WorldJurassic World
Rating: 9.6
Jupiter AscendingJupiter Ascending
Rating: 8.5
The WifeThe Wife
Rating: 8.3
My SpyMy Spy
Rating: 8.8
Rating: 7.5

Product reviews...

Everyone is welcome to post a review. You will need to Join up or log in to post yours.

Click here to read the profile of alexmoulton

Review by: alexmoulton (Alex)
Dated: 7th of February, 2020

Link to this review Report this review


This Review: 7.8/10
Pay to see it again:
Score 6 out of 10
Attention Span:
Score 7 out of 10
Score 8 out of 10
Special Effects:
Score 10 out of 10

What a long and peculiar name. Birds of Prey (And The Fantabulous Emancipation of One Harley Quinn) as a film, is just as bizarre. Like dipping a piece of chocolate in orange juice, the overall flavour is distinctive, but it isn't the most enjoyable.

DC has come a long way with its DCEU properties since the dreaded days of Batman vs Superman and Justice League and has worked best when it limited its films to a single topic and allowed the more fantastical elements of the comic book universe to come to life. Shazam! and Wonder Woman were refreshing as the connections to the rest of the DCEU were vastly limited to references and easter eggs, and not actually using the screentime to set-up plots for future movies. Birds of Prey is another example of a largely standalone film, full of whimsical elements, but it falls short of being something great. It actually struggles to be average.

Helmed by some new talent in the industry, it is written by Christina Hodson, and directed by Cathy Yan. Birds of Prey is only Yan's second feature film, and Hodson has only been writing feature films since 2016, most notably writing for the Transformers spin-off, Bumblebee. While it is exciting to see some more non-male representation in films, the lack of experience is noticeable as the Birds of Prey has a tendency to copy other styles, rather than create its own. It will likely be difficult to find a review that doesn't compare this film to that of Tim Millers's 'merc-with-a-mouth', Deadpool (or closer yet, David Leitch's Deadpool 2, with Cassandra Cain having a similar role to that of Rusty Collins), with the same style of meta-humour, over-use of narration, and glorification of violence. Beyond that, the film also carries the same energy, non-linear narrative with visually creative tangents, that is reminiscent of those late 90's films from Danny Boyle and Guy Ritchie (specifically that of Trainspotting, and Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels).

Starting off the film with an extensive animated opening scene overlayed with exposition, the audience is fed the entire history of Harley Quinn before the film starts. When the only necessary information from that was that she was in a toxic relationship and they broke up, spending several minutes of recapping Suicide Squad seems unnecessary. But that is how all exposition is provided to the audience; through narration, going against the rule of "show don't tell". Narration, in and of itself, is not a bad thing, but when it is used as a substitute for strong scriptwriting and character development, that is when it takes on a negative element.

The character development in Birds of Prey is lacking substantially. There is only one thematic arc throughout the entire film, and the characters are forced to comply with that theme, rather than giving the characters any real strong choices in the film. It gives the characters a passive status that makes them far less interesting to watch. Black Canary, Cassandra Cain, and even Harley Quinn are all simply along for the ride. Pushed along by external forces of the male antagonist Black Mask, and even the Joker's lack of presence having a larger effect than any decisions the female protagonists make. Any sense of conflict was resolved within a scene or two. It provides little to no stakes, which combined with weak character development means there is little reason to care about the characters in the film.

For the most part, the casting was great. Margot Robbie is still an absolute queen as the unstable Harley Quinn, Jurnee Smollett-Bell is a powerful looking Black Canary, and Ewan MacGregor makes a for an outright flamboyantly quizzical Black Mask. The two characters that did not fit in were Mary Elizabeth Winstead's Huntress and Rosie Perez's Detective Montoya. Both from a visual perspective and through their role in the story, they feel so out-of-place and simply added on. Huntress' arc is practically its own story independent of Quinn's arc. and Montoya has no necessary function at all. It's to say that Birds of Prey spread itself too thin, trying to introduce the Birds of Prey team, and also cover Harley Quinn's emancipation, but didn't have the time to do both stories justice.

With little worth writing home about, in terms of the narrative, the standout component of the film is the visuals. With a plethora of costume changes and vivid environments, Birds of Prey is, for the most part, very engaging for the eyes. The cinematography is pretty reasonable from Matthew Libatique (best known for his work on such classics as Phone Booth, Inside Man, Iron Man, Black Swan, Mother!, and Venom) with an almost schizophrenic nature to the camera style, switching between wide-angle steady-cam shots and the closer epileptic shaky-cam that creates a frenetic sequence that is somewhat difficult to follow. The choreography was well executed with a great variety of actions, movements, weapons, and combinations to keep things interesting.

While Birds of Prey (And The Fantabulous Emancipation of One Harley Quinn) does have the nice message that you don't need a man to protect you when you have a strong support network, the way in which it puts forward that message, is almost contradictory. With too much unnecessary exposition and narration, weak character development, and no big threats, Birds of Prey was 109 minutes of "nothing special". This should have been split into two films, the emancipation of Harley Quinn could have been a strong dramatic feat, considering the overwhelming popularity of Joker. The action was well-executed but held back by the lack of depth in its characters.

On the upside, Bruce the Hyena is brilliant, and I wish I saw more of him!

Guest comments...

Random listing from 'Movies'...

Score: 9.3
Product reviews for listing 6862: Wild
Directed by Jean-Marc Vallee

Product image for WildWith the dissolution of her marriage and the death of her mother, Cheryl Strayed has lost all hope. After years of reckless, destructive behavior, she makes a rash decision. With absolutely no experience, driven only by sheer determination, Cheryl hikes more than a thousand miles of the Pacific Crest Trail, alone.

Wild powerfully captures the terrors and pleasures of one young woman forging ahead against all odds on a journey that maddens, strengthen, and ultimately heals her.

Go to the listing

General Disclaimer...

Protected by Copyscape Plagiarism Checker - Do not copy content from this page. Creative Commons Licence All trademarks, images and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective companies.
KIWIreviews is an independent entity, part of the Knock Out News Group. This is a free public forum presenting user opinions on selected products, and as such the views expressed do not necessarily reflect the opinion of kiwireviews.nz and are protected under New Zealand law by the "Honest Opinion" clause of the Defamation Act of 1992. KIWIreviews accepts no liability for statements made on this site, on the premise that they have been submitted as the true and honest opinions of the individual posters. In most cases, prices and dates stated are approximate and should be considered as only guidelines.

"Why do toasters always have a setting so high that could burn the toast to a horrible crisp, which no decent human being would eat?"

KIWIreviews Help GuideClick here for the Help Guide Subscribe to our Twitter streamVisit our
Twitter feed
Visit our Facebook pageVisit our
Facebook page
Visit our YouTube ChannelVisit our
YouTube channel
Follow us on instagramVisit our
Instagram album
Visit our Google+ pageVisit our
Google+ page
Visit our Flickr photostreamVisit our
Flickr photostream